<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new 2010 Ford Taurus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark_hensley@sbcglobal.net</title>
		<link>http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html/comment-page-1#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>mark_hensley@sbcglobal.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>It is the real deal.  The Ford Taurus is a serious contender with few compromises. This mass produced car comes closest to a limited production run of a niche vehicle, like a Shelby Mustang.  These type of vehicles are manufactured paying close attention to detail, built with tremendous pride and swagger.  I think it is an outstanding effort by Ford, my hats off to the team and to the product.  

Respectfully, someone commented about BMW being a better product in the $43,000 range. I beg to differ in this economy. If this where the 90's he may have a point.  In this rugged auto environment, the better buy is the car that is cost effective to maintain and performs at a high level with a build quality that is arguably among the best due to engineering, instead of merely electronic wizardry as a solution to problem of transportation.  Ford has made a compelling case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the real deal.  The Ford Taurus is a serious contender with few compromises. This mass produced car comes closest to a limited production run of a niche vehicle, like a Shelby Mustang.  These type of vehicles are manufactured paying close attention to detail, built with tremendous pride and swagger.  I think it is an outstanding effort by Ford, my hats off to the team and to the product.  </p>
<p>Respectfully, someone commented about BMW being a better product in the $43,000 range. I beg to differ in this economy. If this where the 90&#8217;s he may have a point.  In this rugged auto environment, the better buy is the car that is cost effective to maintain and performs at a high level with a build quality that is arguably among the best due to engineering, instead of merely electronic wizardry as a solution to problem of transportation.  Ford has made a compelling case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html/comment-page-1#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>SHO!!!!!!

And as far as that 335xi goes...that's a smaller car with a much slower engine...so what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHO!!!!!!</p>
<p>And as far as that 335xi goes&#8230;that&#8217;s a smaller car with a much slower engine&#8230;so what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html/comment-page-1#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>Saw one the other day fly by me on the highway, from what I could make out of it, it looked really cool...definately a head-turner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw one the other day fly by me on the highway, from what I could make out of it, it looked really cool&#8230;definately a head-turner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fodaddy19</title>
		<link>http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html/comment-page-1#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>fodaddy19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taurusanswers.com/the-new-2010-ford-taurus.html#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>The SHO is very nice, but it's about $7k overpriced. I can get a BMW 335xi for the same price. At $35k w/ Nav &amp; performance package it's a world beater, at $43k it's up against very formidable cars and isn't that great of a deal.  The other Tauruses are quite competitive against their primary competition.

Edit: I'm a Ford, guy Ford's are all I've ever owned. But If you're comparing engineering, the 3 Series is ahead of the Taurus in spades. It's lighter, handles better and has more sophistaced AWD system. Also BMW foots the bill for all maintence for 3 years. So the argument for the cost of servicing isn't valid. 

I'm a Ford guy, but I try to be as objective as possible and judge cars on their own merit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SHO is very nice, but it&#8217;s about $7k overpriced. I can get a BMW 335xi for the same price. At $35k w/ Nav &amp; performance package it&#8217;s a world beater, at $43k it&#8217;s up against very formidable cars and isn&#8217;t that great of a deal.  The other Tauruses are quite competitive against their primary competition.</p>
<p>Edit: I&#8217;m a Ford, guy Ford&#8217;s are all I&#8217;ve ever owned. But If you&#8217;re comparing engineering, the 3 Series is ahead of the Taurus in spades. It&#8217;s lighter, handles better and has more sophistaced AWD system. Also BMW foots the bill for all maintence for 3 years. So the argument for the cost of servicing isn&#8217;t valid. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Ford guy, but I try to be as objective as possible and judge cars on their own merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

