<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1989 Mercedes-Benz 190E 2.6 or 1996 Ford Taurus SHO V8?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taurusanswers.com/1989-mercedes-benz-190e-26-or-1996-ford-taurus-sho-v8.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taurusanswers.com/1989-mercedes-benz-190e-26-or-1996-ford-taurus-sho-v8.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joesmart8699</title>
		<link>http://taurusanswers.com/1989-mercedes-benz-190e-26-or-1996-ford-taurus-sho-v8.html/comment-page-1#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>joesmart8699</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taurusanswers.com/1989-mercedes-benz-190e-26-or-1996-ford-taurus-sho-v8.html#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>I believe the Benz still had engineered parts while the SHO had cast parts, The Benz I have (1976 SEL) Has 189,000 mi and is still a baby. The engineered part has a better fit and a longer life. If either vehicle may have been rat raced or hard driven and has smelly tranny oil or sidewall tire wear (wires hanging out) then pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the Benz still had engineered parts while the SHO had cast parts, The Benz I have (1976 SEL) Has 189,000 mi and is still a baby. The engineered part has a better fit and a longer life. If either vehicle may have been rat raced or hard driven and has smelly tranny oil or sidewall tire wear (wires hanging out) then pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

